Evaluating Evidence for Decision-making: Five Main Areas to Question
Evaluating Evidence for Decision-making: Five Main Areas to Question
Conditions d’achèvement
Quality
- Is this research published in a peer-reviewed journal? Who published it? Is it a relevant publication to the decision?
- Has this material been cited by others? Recently? Why....as a good example, bad example, foundational info? Are the claims supported or challenged by other authors?
- How convincing is what the researcher is saying? What arguments support the main point?
- Have limitations and biases been identified and acknowledged?
- Does the researcher include counterevidence of their claim? Have they included all viewpoints? Are there opposing views to consider?
Accuracy
- Is the evidence credible? Are the facts accurate? What methodology was used?
- Is the information credible? Is it verifiable?
- Was the data triangulated?
Author
- Is the author known or credible in their field? How can I tell? What are their credentials?
- Have they published a substantial amount of work? Are they known? Are they well documented? What are their affiliations?
- What could be influencing their conclusions? Who provided funding for their research?
- Can I trust their research?
Purpose
- What is the researcher trying to do/achieve? What is their position on this topic? What is the ‘so what’?
- Is the researcher or author stating fact or opinion? If facts, are they backed up?
- What is the main point? What is the purpose of this material? What questions are being addressed?
Currency
- What is the date on this research / evidence? Is it current or ‘classic’?
- How frequently is this publication published?
Other questions that we might ask are:
- How was the research funded?
- What assumptions did the researcher make, if any?
- Does it seem like there is an Inclination to favour certain evidence over other evidence because it is ‘home grown’ or produced in-house?
Not every question will be relevant to every evaluation, but this is a good starting point to look at the materials you gather for decision-making. Barends et al., (2014, p. 11) describes the best available evidence should be gathered, then tested for trustworthiness.
This video (What is Critical Thinking?) provides a summary of what to consider when weighing evidence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnJ1bqXUnIM
Modifié le: vendredi 7 mai 2021, 09:26